I Pledge Allegiance, to William Shakespeare

Kansas City, like many thriving metropolises (is that the correct plural form of that word?), has an annual Shakespeare in the Park to-do that’s kind of a medium-size deal. I have only been three times. I went to see Macbeth last year, and then this year, with the return of the double-performance feature, I saw both A Midsummer Night’s Dream and Antony & Cleopatra.

My prior exposure to MND was seeing that horrid movie version that came out around, oh, I don’t know, 2000? 2001? (IMDB says 1999. I was very close.) And then of course I read the play in my undergraduate Shakespeare class – begrudgingly, since my memories of the movie were so negative. (And I’m sure in that class we watched – if not the entire thing, at least some clips from – one of the myriad movie adaptations out there.) Luckily, I enjoyed reading it rather more than watching the movie, but I still didn’t have a positive overall memory of the play.

My expectation for Kansas City’s version of A Midsummer Night’s Dream was thus: I would enjoy it only insomuch as I enjoyed the company I saw it with. To that end, I  gathered up some of the best metro company around, in the form of five friends and a baby, and we shared blankets, refreshments, and lots of mirth as we gathered on the lawn for the play.

Before we went, I had flipped through my copy of the well-chewed (thanks to the dog) THE COMPLETE WORKS OF SHAKESPEARE (which, due to its size, caused a friend of mine, upon recently seeing me reading it from a distance, to ask if it was a science or medical textbook). I wanted to skim through my margin notes on this particular play, just to give myself a quick reminder of the basic plot. My refresher course went like this: Play inside a play. Pyramus & Thisbe. Some forest confusion involving ribald fairies and nymphs and unrequited love and…an ass? There’s a particularly obnoxious mischief maker named Puck. Then back to the castle for the rest of the frame play, happy ending, lots of laughter and delighted tears. Whether one’s previous experiences with a single play are positive or negative, that sort of bare-bones recap isn’t going to do much to persuade one’s expectations in either direction.

Even so, sharing the company of good friends really can add a glossy sheen to any occasion. So, given my companions, the outdoors, and the refreshments, I was already pleased with the outcome of the event within half an hour of having left my house. And then the best part of the whole evening happened: The play began. I witnessed, hands down, the best adaptation and performance of Midsummer Night’s Dream I have ever had the opportunity to see. The speech was easy to follow, the story line a cinch to pick up. Things flowed along smoothly, and the opportunities to laugh were frequent and numerous.

The actor I was most impressed with was the one who played Puck, coincidentally. He flew, jumped, somersaulted, and acrobatted all over the stage, and he perfected this sycophantic, servile facial expression that he adopted whenever he spoke to Oberon, his master. In fact, in these interactions with Oberon, the expression on Puck’s face consistently reminded me of Ed the Hyena from The Lion King. And, somehow, this was just fitting.

The entire performance was laced with an air of merriment that the actors could not have faked. It was raw and contagious, and of course it was catalyzed early in the first act by the sole canine thespian breaking free from its leash and bolting from the stage (clearly not part of the script, but the cast handled it and the audience’s reactive laughter and resultant momentary distraction well). The actors got a standing ovation at the end, and they deserved it. The energy between the audience and the stage was palpable, and it was a good night to be at the theater (in the park). And, no offense to my awesome friends, but I rather think I would’ve enjoyed the play whether they’d been there or not!

I can’t say the same for Antony and Cleopatra, though. My prior exposure to A&C before a couple of weeks ago was zero. Before I went to see the Kansas City version, I once again used THE COMPLETE WORKS OF SHAKESPEARE to read the whole play so I could get a head start on following it live. As I read, I didn’t think I disliked it, although Act IV does get tedious. So, I don’t know if it’s this particular acting company’s approach to tragedies or if I truly don’t love Antony & Cleopatra as a piece of literature/art in and of itself, but I was not moved by this performance. That night, it was almost exclusively the friends I was with who helped me immensely enjoy the night, rather than the acting. I got bored before intermission (whereas I was genuinely surprised at MND when it was time for the fifteen-minute break).

The reason I say it could be the troupe’s interpretation of tragedies is that I felt the same way about Macbeth last year, and normally I appreciate and enjoy Macbeth. They took a lot of sexual liberties with the Macbeth adaptation last year, even going as far as to make us all gasp in shock when Lady Macbeth jumped Macbeth in the middle of the stage, and they both went crashing down to the floor; then proceeded to hump for several awkward seconds. Thinking this might be an impromptu ad-lib added as an especial treat for our performance only,  I checked around with other friends who saw the play on different nights, and they gave the same report. For me, this bold addition cheapened and perverted (pardon the pun) the core of Shakespeare’s message, as if they were implying that his writing wasn’t good enough to stand on its own merit, or else that the audience wasn’t elite intelligentsia enough, and they must add these bawdy interludes to keep us from nodding off. (Now I’m not only insulted on Shakespeare’s behalf; I’m enraged on my own!)

Back to Antony & Cleopatra. Setting aside the fact that the titular characters were played by the same lead actors who so offended me in Macbeth, one thing that could let this acting company off the hook is to consider the possibility that I just don’t love this particular play. And that is indeed possible. After all, the story centers around a middle-aged couple who act with less sense than the adolescent Romeo & Juliet (don’t even get me started on them). And there’s a secondary story featuring four men who are essentially in a machismo contest, all trying to conquer the world and all unable to swallow their pride long enough to figure out how to share the pieces of that world. To be frank, it’s embarrassing to watch such a juvenile plot be played out amongst characters who are supposed to be grown adults.

It’s embarrassing fictionally and historically speaking. Where, after all, would Shakespeare get the idea for such a silly story? Well, from real life, unfortunately. The leaders of Ancient Rome were a lot of good things, but I don’t think mature, play well with others, and morally sensible were on the list. The only welcome bits of this play were the blunt sexual innuendos (for their comic relief factor and shock value) and the beginning of all the deaths (since that meant the play was nearing its end).

Kansas City’s Shakespeare in the Park is a cultural touchstone that should be experienced, I’ll warrant. But this year, if you’ve only got time to get to one of the plays, make sure it’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Whatever your feelings are about the theater, or parks, or various Shakespeare plays, one thing cannot be denied: Will was brilliant, and exposure to his work can only make us better people.

Advertisements

9 Comments

Filed under bloggy, experimental, reviews, writing exercises

9 responses to “I Pledge Allegiance, to William Shakespeare

  1. Wesley McKain

    Hail, worthy SITP companion. I was also unmoved by Antony & Cleopatra, for lots of the same reasons. The story itself seems implausible. Cleopatra is too hysterical, the men vying for world domination are too childish and irresponsible. All of Antony’s advisers were like, “Antony, fight on land, our sea captains are inexperienced and we’ll lose if we battle at sea,” but then he fights the battle of Actium at sea because…Cleopatra told him to do it. I mean, I suppose he eventually gets beaten by Caesar because he’s intemperate/in love and Caesar is calculating, but it’s overplayed for dramatic effect. But I agree, the company made the night :)

    • Seriously! And then, after he lost, he yelled and Cleopatra and blamed her for everything…and then started making out with her. Ridiculous. I’m glad I’m not the only one. And I’m glad you were there with me!

      • Wesley McKain

        I haven’t been in many serious relationships, so maybe the big-fight-then-make-out thing does actually happen, and I just don’t know about it.

        You know, it takes some great actors to people like Cleopatra, Antony, and Caesar. Different kinds of actors than Romeo and Juliet. Romeo and Juliet were impetuous, love-struck kids. These guys are supposed to have weight, gravity, supreme confidence. I mean, to think the whole world was there for your pleasure and glory. The actors were good, but they acted too…normal. Maybe it’s fantasy, but I want the king or commander on stage to act in such a way as to make me wish I was his servant or vassal. To radiate nobility. I just didn’t feel it in this. I’ll have to read the play and see if I can imagine it differently.

  2. Kalyn

    I miss Shakespeare in the Park! Damn Oklahoma and its too-hot-to-handle weather and propensity to fires.

    • Kalyn

      Did Oklahoma used to have SITP program? It’s been crazy hot here too. One night that we went, it was like mid-70s and low 80s all day long. And then, just as we left to go to Shakespeare around 6:30, the temperature spiked up to the mid-90s and stayed there until well after 11pm. Tell me THAT is not ridiculous. It was an EXTREMELY hot night. And all the more infuriating because the heat made no sense after the sun went down. Next summer, road trip it up here and go to Shakespeare with me!

      • Wesley McKain

        I’m sure they have a Shakespeare festival in Oregon or something. Y’all should go there instead.

      • Kalyn

        I apologize for not responding to this. I just realized when I commented on your most recent blog post that I had accidentally marked not to notify me when my comments are responded to. MISTAKE. So I’ve scrolled back a few posts to double-check my responses and make sure I haven’t been ignoring you. And I do believe that SITP would be totally worth road-tripping for.

  3. b longfellow

    I completely agree with your assessment of the actor who played Puck. His physical displays alone were astounding and really made the play in my opinion. Coupled with the sound effects, it was the coolest fairy performance I’ve witnessed.

    I’m curious why the last movie adaptation was horrible in your opinion. Not a big Rupert Everett fan?

    • Longfellow,

      I’m glad you enjoyed the Puck performance as much as I did. He was pretty impressive. My distaste for the movie adaptation may have been a result of my age. I was, after all, only 14 or 15 in 1999, and I don’t think a proper appreciation for Shakespeare can have been cultivated by that age, at least not for me (especially given how long it’s taken me to appreciate some of the world’s classic novels). I think I’m just slow to literary appreciation. If I saw the movie again now, I might not dislike it so much. All I can really remember is being bored and unable to follow the story line as well as I would have liked.

Your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s